Church statements the latest use of Iran’s Assyrian, Armenian Christians as regime propaganda

Church statements the latest use of Iran’s Assyrian, Armenian Christians as regime propaganda

The Iranian regime continues to use the voices of its recognised Christian minority as part of its propaganda drive against the ongoing protests in the country.

A copy of one of the four statements from Assyrian and Armenian churches in Tehran over the past two weeks.

The latest example is a set of public statements – evidently penned by the intelligence services but bearing the insignia of the main branches of the Armenian and Assyrian churches in Tehran – released over the past two weeks.

The statements, which differ slightly in wording but not in tone, lament not the killing of more than 450 of protesters, including over 60 children, but the lost lives of security forces who have died “defending national security”.

In keeping with regime rhetoric, the protests are referred to as “disturbances”, blamed on “enemies” and “foreigners”, and support is declared for the “noble system” of the Islamic Republic.

The statements come after 40-50 Assyrian youths who either participated in or announced support online for protests were warned by their church leaders and MP, Sharli Envieh, at the behest of the security services.

The Assyrian former MP, Yonathan Betkolia, then gave a lengthy interview to state media, in which he called protesters and those who “incite” them a “poisonous fungus” and “cancerous tumour” that “must be operated on and separated from the Iranian Christian community”.

But while these leading Christian representatives inside the country continue to toe the party line, a host of Iranian-Armenian and Assyrian citizens from inside and outside the country have now come together to show they have a very different perspective. 

In videos posted on social media, over 35 Iranian-Armenians and Assyrians express their full support for the protesters, whom they call their “heroes” and “brave brothers and sisters”, and repeat the slogan of the new revolution: “women, life, freedom.”

In one video, an Assyrian opens with the words, “In the name of the God of the rainbow” – as did the captain of Iran’s football team at the World Cup – in reference to a 10-year-old boy, Kian Pirfalak, killed in the protests who made a wooden vessel which he dedicated to this deity.

And Article18’s director, Mansour Borji, says that it is in these videos – and not the words of the church leaders – that the true voice of the Assyrian and Armenian minority can be found.

“Assyrians living inside the country who have engaged in protests have been silenced and at least 50 warned after posting online in support of the uprising,” he said. “And this has only been those identified with online surveillance. So, there may be more who are on the streets but refrain from online activities. 

“And given the small size of their community [approximately 20,000-25,000 Assyrians live in Iran] their level of engagement has been considerable.

“No-one can say for certain that a majority are supportive of protests – or of the government for that matter! There are no reliable surveys in this respect. But as an indicator, for a small community to be warned in such a manner – with their MP and religious leaders summoned to a meeting with intelligence officials – and then forcing a statement out of each church denomination and providing a list of names of active protesters; all of this exposes the threat the regime faces, and the heavy investment they have made in time and resources to counter it. 

“In other words, the counter measures used tell you something about the level of threat they sense.”

Converts cleared of wrongdoing in second trial on identical charges

Converts cleared of wrongdoing in second trial on identical charges

Left to right: Ahmad Sarparast, Morteza Mashoodkari, and Ayoob Poor-Rezazadeh.

Three “Church of Iran” members serving five-year prison sentences for “spreading deviant beliefs contrary to Islam” have been cleared of wrongdoing in a second trial on identical charges

Meanwhile, in a separate development, one of the men, Morteza Mashoodkari, has had his prison sentence reduced by half.

The second trial took place on 2 November at a Rasht Revolutionary Court. A week later, Morteza was informed that he had also been granted a “partial pardon” and reduction of his sentence to two and a half years.

Morteza is now on 10 days’ leave from prison, having become eligible for furlough, having served a sufficient proportion of his reduced sentence.

No explanation was given for Morteza’s pardon – nor why it was only partial – while there has been no such pardon for the two other “Church of Iran” members imprisoned alongside him, Ahmad Sarparast and Ayoob Poor-Rezazadeh.

Article18’s director, Mansour Borji, said the decision to pardon only one of the three appeared “completely random”, and linked to a wider pardoning of thousands of prisoners in recent months, including Christian converts Nasser Navard Gol-Tapeh and Fariba Dalir.

“While all three converts are part of the same case and the charges under which they are unjustly convicted is identical, the judicial authorities have offered no explanation as to why the reduced prison sentence has not also been offered to the other two converts,” he said.

Mr Borji added that the ruling in this second trial has no bearing on the first, even though the charges were identical.

Meanwhile, the lawyer who defended the three men at their most recent court appearance, Mustafa Nili, is also now in detention, having been arrested at a Tehran airport a week after the hearing in Rasht.

Background

Left to right: Milad Goodarzi, Amin Khaki, and Alireza Nourmohammadi.

Morteza, Ahmad and Ayoob are the second trio of “Church of Iran” members to have been imprisoned under the amended Article 500 of the penal code, after Milad Goodarzi, Amin Khaki, and Alireza Nourmohammadi, who have been in prison since November 2021.

Morteza, Ahmad and Ayoob were first arrested in September 2021, and sentenced in April 2022. They were rearrested a month later and have been in prison ever since.

Many members of the “Church of Iran” have been imprisoned in recent years, including Pastor Yousef Nadarkhani, who once faced the death sentence for “apostasy”.

The denomination’s views on the Trinity are unorthodox, leading some sections of the wider Church to disassociate themselves from the group. 

The controversy surrounding them has also been used by the Iranian regime as a way of presenting its members as “deviant”. For example, in Ahmad, Morteza and Ayoob’s initial trial, the prosecutor called them “Satan-worshippers”.

In their first last defence in February, the three men said they were “just Christians worshipping according to the Bible” and “have not engaged in any propaganda against the regime or any action against national security”.

UNHRC Special Session the ‘beginning of the end for Iran’s sense of impunity’

UNHRC Special Session the ‘beginning of the end for Iran’s sense of impunity’

Article18 director Mansour Borji has welcomed yesterday’s historic decision by UN Human Rights Council members to send a fact-finding mission to investigate claims of human rights violations related to the ongoing protests.

“This isn’t final – there is more to do,” Mr Borji said, “but I really hope that this is now the beginning of the end for Iran’s sense of impunity, and that they now sense that they are accountable to the world and international institutions.”

Ahead of the session, Article18 and partner organisation CSW circulated a joint submission to member states, in which we argued that, “at their core, the ongoing protests are a cry for freedom: the freedom of the Iranian people to live in a way that corresponds with their beliefs”.

“Mahsa Amini was arrested, and ultimately killed, because she was deemed to have failed to properly adhere to the dress code of the majority faith – a dress code that for nearly 44 years has been imposed on Iranians of all faiths and none,” we said.

“We do not believe that this is right. Furthermore, we believe that by imposing such a dress code on all Iranians, the Islamic Republic is failing to abide by its obligations as a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which articulates the right to ‘have or adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and … to manifest [ones] religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.’”

You can read the full text of the submission below.


Article18 and CSW would like to express our appreciation for the convening of a special session on Iran by the Human Rights Council. We also extend our condolences to all who are mourning, and our solidarity to those continuing to risk their lives in the search for justice.

At their core, the ongoing protests are a cry for freedom: the freedom of the Iranian people to live in a way that corresponds with their beliefs. 

Mahsa Amini was arrested, and ultimately killed, because she was deemed to have failed to properly adhere to the dress code of the majority faith – a dress code that for nearly 44 years has been imposed on Iranians of all faiths and none.

We do not believe that this is right. Furthermore, we believe that by imposing such a dress code on all Iranians, the Islamic Republic is failing to abide by its obligations as a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which articulates the right to ‘have or adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and … to manifest [ones] religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.’

Even in its constitution, the Islamic Republic fails to adhere to these guidelines, by only recognising Islam, as well as Judaism, Christianity and Zoroastrianism.  All other religions or beliefs – such as Baha’ism, Yarsanism, Mandaeism, Irreligion, and conversion, particularly to Christianity – remain unrecognised. Adherents face discrimination, harassment, and even persecution[1] through arrest, imprisonment, denial of education, torture, confiscation of property, among other things, and even recognised religious and belief minorities do not enjoy equal rights, experiencing widespread discrimination. 

We believe that freedom of religion or belief is a ‘bellwether right’: its absence or severe restriction is an early warning or indication of a deterioration in the general situation of human rights, which could eventually occasion civil unrest. Freedom of religion or belief ‘encourages respect for diversity, and its free exercise contributes towards strengthening democracy, development, rule of law, peace and stability. Neglecting, restricting or routinely violating this right can have far-reaching and serious consequences,’[2] as we are currently observing in Iran.

With the death toll set to mount even further amidst the indiscriminate use of live ammunition against unarmed men, women and children, and as the regime institutes a policy of pronouncing death sentences on protestors for allegedly ‘waging war against God’ when they are simply calling for greater rights and freedoms, we are urging the Council to initiate stronger measures to assist Iranian citizens including:

  • Urgently mandating and resourcing an independent investigative mechanism to closely monitor the current situation alongside the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Iran, with a focus on evidence gathering, and ensuring accountability for crimes under international law and other serious human rights violations which have occurred during the course of these protests.
  • Ensuring that future dialogues and interactions with Iran will be contingent on ending the use of excessive force and fast-tracked courts which lack due process and issue excessive sentences, releasing all who are currently detained arbitrarily in connection with the protests, returning the bodies of victims to their families in a timely manner, and facilitating the full enjoyment of the rights and freedoms articulated in the ICCPR.  
  • Fully supporting the work of the Special Rapporteur on Iran, and ensuring the mandate has every resource required to fulfil its duties. 
  • Encouraging the Special Rapporteur and other UN Special Procedures and Treaty Bodies to include the right to freedom of religion or belief in their monitoring and reporting, addressing the unique vulnerabilities and violations faced by religious or belief communities and those seeking to assist them. 
  • The formulation by individual nations of effective measures to bring to account Iranian officials suspected of committing crimes under international law, and Iranian oligarchs and their families living abroad, including through human rights sanctions regimes, asset freezes, travel bans, and invoking extraterritorial jurisdiction wherever and whenever possible.

[1] By ‘Persecution’ we mean ‘the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity’ (Art. 7.2. g Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court).

[2] CSW, “Freedom of Religion or Belief Around the World”, 2018

Assyrian protesters a ‘cancerous tumour’ in Iran’s Christian community, says former MP

Assyrian protesters a ‘cancerous tumour’ in Iran’s Christian community, says former MP

The photograph used by state media in the interview with Mr Betkolia, showing the former MP standing alongside the flags of the Assyrian people (left) and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

The former parliamentary representative of Iran’s Assyrian minority has launched a barely believable attack on Christians inside and outside the country who have either participated in or encouraged participation in the ongoing protests.

In a lengthy interview with state media outlet ISNA, Yonathan Betkolia calls the “rioters” – the word used by regime figures to describe protesters – and those who have “incited” them a “poisonous fungus” and “cancerous tumour” that “must be operated on and separated from the Iranian Christian community”.

Mr Betkolia, who served five terms in the Iranian parliament, has for a long time been a controversial figure who has on many occasions toed the regime line, and this latest interview is no exception. 

The former representative begins the interview, when asked for his analysis of “the events that started with the death of Ms Mahsa Amini”, by not once mentioning the young woman by name or offering sympathy to her family, but instead launching straight into a criticism of the “opportunists”, as he calls them, who have used her death as an “excuse” to begin demonstrations, which, he says, have since been “diverted from their original path”.

For this reason, he says, he has always discouraged Christians from participating in demonstrations.

Mr Betkolia goes on to seemingly defend the mandatory hijab laws in Iran, which are also imposed upon non-Muslims – including Christians – by highlighting that Assyrian women, too, wear headscarves in church.

He then even thanks Iran’s security forces for, as he puts it, their “humane approach” towards Christians in warning Assyrians not to participate in further demonstrations.

This shows the Islamic Republic’s “positive and humane view of Christians”, Mr Betkolia says.

“I kiss the hands of these loved ones [Iran’s security forces],” he adds, “and pray God goes behind you and protects you.”

Mr Betkolia also heaps praise on Iran’s Supreme Leader, hailing him for the“small” but “impressive” gesture of once eating the homemade cake of an Assyrian woman. 

Ayatollah Khamenei’s “encouraging” and “sincere behaviour” “shocked the world”, Mr Betkolia says, and “more attention should have been paid to it”. 

Christians should “be grateful for having such a country and leader”, he says.

The former representative says he wishes the protests had “never happened”, and that “we would all join hands to fix our problems”.

“The way to solve problems is not to break and set fire to things,” he says, “or start controversies by sharing photos and videos in cyberspace.”

When asked by the interviewer whether there are “problems of disobedience” within the Assyrian community, Mr Betkolia blames the Covid-19 pandemic for decreasing the engagement of young Assyrians with the church, leading, he says, to a number – “no greater in number than the fingers of one hand” – “gathering and making plans for themselves … for which they were warned”. 

“I hope they stop their work,” he adds. 

Perhaps Mr Betkolia is referring here to the 40 to 50 young people recently warned by Assyrian church leaders, at the behest of the security services and Mr Betkolia’s successor, to have no further involvement in the protests.

Mr Betkolia says he wishes Assyrians were more self-critical, and that he regrets a lack of dialogue among the community and that Assyrian associations in various cities have not issued statements against the protests.

He also criticises the appointment of an Assyrian patriarch from the United States – a place he describes as having “a very different atmosphere from Iran”.

Meanwhile, he complains that he has been denied a visa to the US, where his children live.

Finally, when asked about what he thinks about those who “insist on breaking the rules”, the former representative says he wishes “to live in an environment that’s safe, calm and comfortable”. 

“I don’t like trouble by my side,” Mr Betkolia says. “When a bomb explodes, it harms all religious minorities.”

Article18’s director, Mansour Borji, called Mr Betkolia’s comments “preposterous”, given that the former representative once had the “audacity” at the UN in Geneva to claim that “under the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, race, ethnicity and religion do not distinguish among people [or bestow] superiority to one group over another”. 

Meanwhile, Mr Borji noted how a year before making these comments the former representative was “instrumental in the closure of the church led by his fellow Assyrian pastor, Victor Bet-Tamraz, solely because he had been conducting church services in the Persian language”. 

Mr Borji added that it was “highly hypocritical” of Mr Betkolia to “continuously criticise Western governments, and the US in particular”, while at the same time seeking a visa to the US, “where his children have chosen to live, away from the oppressive policies of the Iranian regime that he so generously praises – policies that have brought young people of the same age as Betkolia’s children onto the streets of Iran to protest for their basic rights”.

UN condemns ‘deteriorating’ human rights situation in Iran

UN condemns ‘deteriorating’ human rights situation in Iran

The UN General Assembly has passed a draft resolution highlighting the “deteriorating” human-rights situation in Iran, including “lethal force resulting in death against peaceful protesters”, as well as “ongoing severe limitations and increasing restrictions on the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief”.

The resolution, which was co-sponsored by 41 countries including the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Israel and a host of EU nations, was passed on Wednesday by a margin of 52, with 80 votes in favour, 28 against and 68 abstentions.

In a discussion before the vote, the representatives of several countries, including Canada, Australia, the UK and US, voiced concern at Iran’s response to the ongoing protests, with the UK representative calling the killing of more than 326 protesters and arrest of over 14,000 “truly abhorrent”.

“The death sentence announced last week for a protester signifies a shocking worsening of the situation,” the UK representative said.

The German representative highlighted the upcoming “special session” on Iran, scheduled to take place in Geneva next week, a move welcomed by the UK representative, who said he hoped  it would “mandate a robust investigation into protest-related human rights violations in Iran”. 

“It is time [the Iranian people’s] fundamental freedoms were upheld,” he said, “including the rights to peaceful assembly, freedom of expression and speech both online and offline. 

“Iran’s leaders must choose another path. Now is the time to stop blaming external actors, to hold up the mirror and start listening to the voices of their people.” 

The New Zealand representative said his country had “suspended indefinitely” bilateral dialogue with Iran, as “we’ve determined that bilateral approaches on human rights with Iran are no longer tenable”.

Panama’s vote in favour of the resolution was added after the vote, at the request of Panama’s representative.

What does the resolution say about religious freedom abuses?

The Australian and New Zealand representatives specifically highlighted the plight of religious minorities in Iran, with the Australian representative calling their discrimination “unjustifiable”, and New Zealand’s representative calling their mistreatment “systemic oppression”.

The resolution expresses “serious concern at the widespread restrictions on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and association and freedom of expression”, and “attacks against places of worship and burial and other human rights violations, including but not limited to the increased harassment, intimidation, persecution, arbitrary arrest and detention of, and incitement to hatred that leads to violence against, persons belonging to recognized and unrecognized religious minorities, including Christians (particularly converts from Islam), Gonabadi Dervishes, Jews, Sufi Muslims, Sunni Muslims, Yarsanis, Zoroastrians, and … Baha’is”.

It calls on the Iranian government to “cease monitoring individuals on account of their religious identity, to release all religious practitioners imprisoned for their membership in or activities on behalf of a minority religious group”, and  “to ensure that everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief, including the freedom to have, to change or to adopt a religion or belief of their choice, in accordance with its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”.

It also calls on the Islamic Republic to “eliminate, in law and in practice, all forms of discrimination on the basis of thought, conscience, religion or belief, including restrictions contained in article 499 bis and article 500 bis of the Islamic Penal Code”.

As Article18 has reported, the amended Articles 499 and 500 were passed into law in early 2021 and have since been used in the prosecution of at least 10 Christian converts, including six now serving prison sentences.

‘Urgent Question’ in UK parliament

On the same day the draft resolution was passed in New York, an “Urgent Question” was brought before the UK parliament in London regarding the current situation in Iran and the treatment of protesters, during which the Iran regime’s persecution of Christians was also highlighted.

“I’d like to ask [about] the Christian community in Iran,” said Conversative MP Tom Hunt. “Just this last Friday I met with someone who fled Iran, is a Christian, and is now a key part of the local church in [the town of] Ipswich. What steps [are] the government taking to support the Christian community in Iran and [the] many people who are fleeing persecution?”

In response, David Rutley, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, said it was “a very good question” on “a subject I feel very strongly about as well”, and promised that he and other colleagues “raise those issues about Christians [with the UK government], but not just Christians – other minorities as well in Iran – which we absolutely need to do.”

USCIRF condemn’s religious charges in Iran protester’s death sentence

USCIRF condemn’s religious charges in Iran protester’s death sentence

(Photo: AP)

The US Commission on International Religious Freedom has condemned the sentencing to death of an Iranian protester on “religiously-grounded charges” and warned of the “credible” threat of “large-scale executions in the coming weeks”.

On Sunday, a Tehran Revolutionary Court sentenced the unnamed protester on charges including “enmity against God” and “corruption on Earth”, which USCIRF noted were “both grounded in religious interpretations”.

The independent, bipartisan group said the ongoing protests in Iran, now two months old, were at their root a cry for Iranians to be granted “their intentionally-guaranteed human rights”, including religious freedom.

USCIRF argued the killing of Mahsa Amini two months ago today was directly related to a lack of religious freedom in Iran, as the 22-year-old was killed “for wearing ‘improper hijab’, a legal standard based on an interpretation of religion and imposed on Iranian women without their consent”.

Commissioner Sharon Kleinbaum welcomed the upcoming UN Human Rights Council special session on Iran, set to take place on 24 November, and called on the US government “to continue to advocate for a UN investigative mechanism to hold accountable Iranian government officials complicit in religious freedom and related human rights violations”.

“Iran’s desperate attempt to violently repress Iranians seeking fundamental guarantees of freedom of religion or belief is deplorable,” she added. “The Biden administration must pursue every available measure to support Iranians asserting their internationally-guaranteed human rights and sanction officials responsible for these ongoing and violent crackdowns.”

Another commissioner, Eric Ueland, said Iranians’ “continuing struggle for religious freedom” was “inspiring”, and called on the US to “lead the international community in uplifting and amplifying the voices of Iranians calling for greater freedom of religion or belief”.

Iran’s Assyrian Christians warned against further involvement in protests

Iran’s Assyrian Christians warned against further involvement in protests

Assyrian parliamentary representative Sharli Envieh.

Iran’s Assyrian Christian minority have been warned by their parliamentary representative and church leaders to have no further involvement in the ongoing protests. 

Article18 was informed yesterday by sources inside the country that between 40 and 50 Assyrian youths, who had either participated in protests or written messages of support on social media, were called this week by their church leaders and told they would be arrested if they did not stop. 

And after an Iranian Christian former prisoner of conscience, Farshid Fathi, lambasted the Assyrian MP and church leaders in an Instagram post, the MP, Sharli Envieh, responded angrily on his own Instagram account, while in so doing confirming the veracity of the claims.

Farshid’s message to Sharli Envieh, which was set as a “temporary post” so is no longer visible on his Insagram account.

Mr Envieh began by attacking Farshid, who is a Christian convert, calling him “a Muslim who only pretended to be a Christian”, before admitting that during a meeting with “security authorities”, he and the three heads of the Assyrian Church in Iran – Catholic, Protestant, and Church of the East – had agreed to “give their fatherly warning to people who work outside the framework set by the regime, so that there will not be any problems for the Assyrian community”.

“Where does it say in the Gospels that young people can be encouraged to engage in activities that break the law and cause issues for our community?” he said, adding: “If you’re really worried about the Iranian community, you could come back to Iran and do these things yourself!”

Article18 understands that the Assyrian youths were told by their church leaders: “Those who have been arrested have been sentenced to death. See what they have done to their own children, who are Muslim, and imagine what they will do to you who are non-Muslims! You are Assyrians; what part do you have in these things?”

But Article18’s sources said some of the Assyrians had responded: “Yes we are Assyrian, but we are also Iranian, and we live in this country. It’s our country too!”

Article18’s advocacy director, Mansour Borji, called the actions of Mr Envieh and the Assyrian church leaders “an embarrassment and collusion with the oppressors, which brings dishonour to both the name of Christ and also the Christian community”. 

He added: “We’re glad that the younger generation are trying, with their actions and also by their words, to be better representatives of Christ in showing solidarity with those who are oppressed.”

And in a direct response to the Assyrian MP’s claim that Christians should not involve themselves in “actions that break the law”, Mr Borji said: “Throughout history a lot of Christian leaders have been exemplary voices of justice to not only their own community but to the rest of the world, gaining inspiration from biblical principles. People like Martin Luther King, Desmond Tutu, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and Haik Hovsepian appealed to the Bible to speak up against injustice and be a prophetic voice in their society.

A screenshot of MP Sharli Envieh’s response to Farshid, and a later joint statement also signed by the three Assyrian church leaders.

“The Assyrian representative should read Psalm 82, which says: ‘How long will you defend the unjust and show partiality to the wicked? Defend the weak and the fatherless; uphold the cause of the poor and the oppressed. Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.’”

Mr Borji added: “It is astounding that he does not even recognise as Christian somebody who has spent over five years of his life in prison for the name of Christ. That shows how exclusive he is. I bet he would not even recognise the Armenian representative in the parliament as a Christian either!”

There are approximately 20,000-25,000 Assyrian Christians in Iran, who along with approximately 100,000 Armenians together make up Iran’s “recognised” Christian community. 

Meanwhile, Christian converts like Farshid are believed to number several hundred thousand – possibly even as many as one million – and yet they are unrecognised both by the regime and also by the senior Armenian and Assyrian leaders who take the regime’s side in exchange for relative peace.

“This is the latest example of how the Iranian authorities use their intelligence and security forces to use representatives of the Church and Iranian parliament as their mouthpiece,” Mr Borji said.

“And by collaborating with the oppressive regime, these church leaders are demonstrating a worrying trend that has been seen over the years, but is now demonstrated in the most explicit way. 

“In the more than 50 days that the protests have been taking place, the websites and social media belonging to the Armenian and Assyrian churches that have close relationships with the Iranian government have not said one single thing about the protests, as if they’re not even living in that context. 

“And now, when they finally speak, it is only to act once more as instruments of state suppression.” 

Mr Borji contrasted this approach with the example of two MPs from the Baluch and Kurdish ethnic minorities who have bravely taken a stand in recent days after 227 MPs called for protesters to be executed

In Farshid’s message, he speculated that the Assyrian representative was likely one of the 227. 

“Shame on you!” Farshid said, in Assyrian. “Stop selling your people!”

He added: “Repent and turn from your false ways, before the day comes when Jesus Christ tells you that he does not know you and ‘vomits you out of his mouth’, as it says in the Book of Revelation.”

Defenders of Christians among over 30 lawyers arrested

Defenders of Christians among over 30 lawyers arrested

Left to right: Babak Paknia, Bahar Sahraian, and Mustafa Nili.

More than 30 lawyers, including at least three involved in defending Christian converts, have been arrested in recent weeks in cities across Iran.

The arrests come as thousands of protesters await trial, without recourse to legal advice, and amid calls from more than 200 Iranian MPs for them to be sentenced to death.

Hossein Ahmadiniaz, an Iranian human-rights defender now living in the Netherlands, told Article18 that many of the arrested lawyers are well-known figures, some of whom had offered legal advice to arrested protesters and openly “demanded the establishment of a legal commission to protect the rights of detainees, including the right of access to a lawyer”.

At least four of those arrested also recently signed a joint statement in support of the ongoing protests, which stated that Iran’s judiciary, “which should exist to defend the rights of citizens”, had become a “despotic” and “corrupt” force, which “deals harshly with any opposition, has grieved many families, and trapped noble and freedom-loving people with false ‘security’ charges”.

Mr Ahmadiniaz said: “For 43 years, the regime of the Islamic Republic has always been hostile to and afraid of lawyers and the Bar Association. In these 43 years, hundreds of lawyers have been illegally detained, tortured and imprisoned, or forced to flee from Iran.”

Among those arrested are three who have helped to defend Christian converts in recent years: Bahar Sahraian, Mustafa Nili, and Babak Paknia.

Ms Sahraian has defended clients including Sam Khosravi and Maryam Falahi, whose adopted daughter, Lydia, was ordered by a court to be removed from their care because they had converted to Christianity and Lydia was considered to have been born a Muslim; and Sara Ahmadi and Homayoun Zhaveh, who are now serving a combined 10 years in Tehran’s Evin Prison, even though Homayoun is 64 years old and suffers from advanced Parkinson’s disease.

In Sam and Maryam’s case, Ms Sahraian managed to obtain two fatwas from Grand Ayatollahs – the most senior Shia Islamic authority in Iran – declaring that, owing to the “critical nature” of the case, poor health of the child and undisputed emotional attachment with her parents, Lydia’s adoption by Christian converts was “permissible”.

She was also one of 120 lawyers to sign an open letter to the head of the judiciary at the time – the now-president, Ebrahim Raisi – calling on him to overturn the decision. (He did not.)

Mustafa Nili, meanwhile, appeared in court in Rasht, northern Iran, just last week to defend three converts already serving five-year prison sentences: Ahmad Sarparast, Morteza Mashoodkari, and Ayoob Poor-Rezazadeh.

Babak Paknia, a colleague of Mustafa’s, has also helped to offer legal assistance in numerous cases involving Christians, in support of another colleague, Iman Soleimani, who has taken on many such cases and as a result has also faced immense pressure from the authorities.

According to reports, at least six of the arrested lawyers, including Mr Paknia, have been released on bail, but the vast majority remain in detention.

‘National security’ charges deliberately vague ‘to mislead public’

‘National security’ charges deliberately vague ‘to mislead public’

Accusations that members of religious minorities, including Christians, are engaged in unspecified “actions against national security” are deliberately vague in order “to mislead the public”, says the author of a recent report on religious propaganda in Iran.

The intention, according to Shahin Milani, executive director of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, is “to basically convince the masses, the public, that these individuals are engaging in nefarious actions against the Iranian state”.

Mr Milani was speaking on Thursday, 3 November, as part of a virtual discussion hosted by the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), for whom his July report was written. 

To illustrate his point, Mr Milani noted how Christian converts are now frequently referred to as “Zionists” by state-sponsored media, when in actual fact the claim “has no basis in reality”.

“It’s an arbitrary tie, an arbitrary link between Christians and Zionism and has no basis in reality,” Mr Milani said. “But they just put it there and try to link Christian converts in Iran to the worldwide Zionist movement, or the State of Israel.

“… Because just attacking religious minorities on religion itself, or on their beliefs, doesn’t have an effect on ordinary Iranians, but tying them to foreign states and arguing that these groups threaten Iran’s security, the government thinks at least it can be effective.” 

Mr Milani cited the example of a Fars News report in January 2021 about the arrest of Christians “in several provinces” who were labelled members of a “Zionist network” who had been “creating moral depravity and promoting religious conversion”.

“The final line of the report stated: ‘Networks connected to the Christian movement have engaged in widespread security efforts in the country,’” Mr Milani noted. “What does it mean: ‘security efforts?’ Really, the propaganda is vague, and it’s vague on purpose because there’s really no truth to it. But they just throw in these terms to mislead the public.”

Mr Milani, who spent time outlining the ways in which each of Iran’s other major religious-minority groups are vilified, also noted that very similar tactics are now being used against protesters.

“The government’s propaganda against ordinary protesters that are on the streets today is also very similar, in the sense of tying them to ‘foreign agents’, and ‘foreign governments’, and ‘foreign spy agencies’,” he said. “It’s a feature of Iranian propaganda, and it’s a charge that is going to be levelled against protesters. It is as baseless as it is against religious minorities.”


You can watch the full discussion, which also included comments from USCIRF Commissioner Eric Ueland, here.

UK courts grapple with church leaders’ expertise in assessing asylum-seekers’ conversion claims

UK courts grapple with church leaders’ expertise in assessing asylum-seekers’ conversion claims

Field House in London, UK, where many asylum cases are decided. (Photo: righttoremain.org.uk)

The question of how much weight should be given to the testimony of church members and leaders in assessing the credibility of asylum-seekers’ claims to have converted to Christianity has become pivotal in UK courts. 

Guidance on this issue is included in the latest policy advice to the Home Office on how to assess the claims of Iranians who say they would be at risk if they were deported because they have become Christians.

The risk genuine converts – including ordinary church members, as well as leaders – would face upon return to Iran was accepted in previous guidance to the Home Office published in March 2020.

The primary question for judges to consider now, therefore, according to the new guidance, is “whether the claimant has demonstrated [to the required standard of proof] that he or she is a Christian”. 

And this is where the testimony of church leaders, and ordinary members, come into play.

In the new guidance, published in September, three cases are offered as examples, two of which involve claimants from a single church in Scotland, The Tron Church in Glasgow.

These two cases also both include the testimony of one man, a retired solicitor and former missionary named John Taylor, who spoke to Article18 about his 13 years ministering to Iranians, Afghans and Iraqi Kurds at The Tron Church.

Mr Taylor says he has been personally involved in hundreds of asylum cases in those years, and that “a lot more people have been getting through their interview with the Home Office” since the 2018 judgment referred to in the new guidance, which brought together the cases of two Iranians identified only as “TF” and “MA”.

In both cases, the asylum-seekers’ initial claims were rejected because judges did not believe they were genuine converts.

But these judgments were overturned in the August 2018 ruling by Lord Glennie, who concluded that the judges had “failed properly to take account of the independent evidence relating to the genuineness of the appellants’ conversions to Christianity” – the evidence of Mr Taylor and other church members. 

Lord Glennie ruled that church members’ testimony should be considered as “admissible opinion evidence which is entitled to respect” and should be “assessed on its merits”, while acknowledging that “it remains for the court or tribunal to make the final decision, and nothing in the expert evidence can take that away from the court or tribunal”.

Lord Glennie added that the church members’ testimonies could be considered as “expert evidence” because it was “based not only on their personal knowledge of those two individuals but also upon their knowledge of what is involved and their experience of others in the same position setting off down the same path”.

However, this opinion was challenged in the second ruling mentioned in the guidance, involving another convert, “MH”, whose case was again initially dismissed because the judge did not believe in the genuineness of the conversion claim.

While the Upper Tribunal judge in this case, Mark Blundell, again criticised the First-tier Tribunal judge in the way he had dismissed the testimony of church members, and called for the case to be heard again, he added that describing such evidence as “expert” “risks elevating the significance of the evidence unduly”.

Reacting to this, Mr Taylor told Article18: “I can understand where that’s coming from, in a sense.

“It was very encouraging for us to have that decision by Lord Glennie. But in one sense we never considered ourselves experts. But in the other sense, what I’ve always been trying to argue with the immigration tribunals and with the Home Office, and all the letters that we’ve written, is that we’re not fools. 

“Whenever a church baptises a member on their profession of faith, we are making an informed decision based on the evidence we see. It’s not only in the words; it’s what they’ve done, courses they’ve done like Christianity Explored, and also their continuous and active involvement in meetings…

“We’re not just rubber-stamping what an asylum-seeker has said to us.”

Mr Taylor added that he had endured “some pretty hard times in the past with immigration tribunals and Home Office ministers, where they have really been very rude and demeaning to Church and church witnesses”, suggesting “Christians were being duped by liars who were telling a tale that suited these gullible Christians’ understanding”.

At the same time, Mr Taylor acknowledged the challenge facing judges attempting to ascertain the genuineness of a person’s faith.

“How can you ever really be sure?” he says. “As I keep saying [in the courts], you can’t see into a person’s heart.” 

Mr Taylor also says he has “no doubt I’ve been lied to by several people over the last 13 years”.

But he stresses that his Glasgow church takes its responsibilities very seriously, and would not baptise anyone unless they genuinely believed their profession of faith.

“I know the systems we put in place,” he says, “and I know that if someone comes in and asks for a letter of support, I will say to them, ‘Come back and see me in six months’ time after you have been involved in church.’”

Mr Taylor also raises the challenge of attempting to “describe the witness of the Holy Spirit” to officials with “no understanding at all of the biblical teaching on conversion”. 

“Sometimes I can meet with a person and I know within weeks through the witness of the Spirit in me that what they say rings true. Or I can be with somebody else for two or three years, who’s coming to church regularly, and I just say to them, ‘You’re a chancer! There’s not the witness there!’ But trying to describe that in court and you’re on a hiding to nothing!”

Meanwhile, Mr Taylor accepts that his church “undoubtedly” faces a problem of “dropouts”: people leaving the church once their asylum claims are accepted.

But he stresses that the problem is not limited to converts, and puts much of it down to lives becoming busy with work and family, with many recognised refugees going on to work in the service and hospitality industries, which don’t leave a lot of free time.

He adds: “We have a lot of students in our church who make professions when they are at college. Yet, when they get out of university and into the workforce and have their families, there is a large proportion who do not go on [coming to church]. So the dropout is not limited to our Iranian friends.”